Linear Versus Concurrent Periodization

The Soviets were determined to beat the West at just about anything they could, including proving that their athletes were superior to ours in every possible way. To achieve that goal, the Soviets invested a lot of time and effort developing new training techniques to help their athletes build bigger, more powerful muscles. Some of them were kind of crazy and fell by the wayside but a few of them have stuck around and actually spread to the West. Periodization - particularly Linear Periodization - is one of the Soviet weight training techniques that did have staying power and was adopted by Western bodybuilders.

The premise of Linear Periodization is that training is broken down into blocks of time (periods) that focus on a specific goal or developing a particular skill set. The periods of Linear Periodization include: hypertrophy (size); strength, power and transition (restoration). In its basic form the model begins with a fairly high volume of low intensity lifting, gradually shifting towards a lower volume of high intensity lifting.

Linear Periodization is among the most popular weight training techniques in the United States. Unfortunately-thanks to some inherent shortcomings in its Western implementation-it's just not all that effective. The biggest issue with it is that while you are focusing on achieving a particular goal like size or strength, the other elements are being ignored. Essentially you have a situation where you are training to develop one particular capacity, but in the mean time, other capacities are being 'detrained.'

For example, one phase centers on building muscle size (hypertrophy). During this stage, your training is focused on developing bigger muscles. However, in the subsequent two phases you focus on building strength and then power. Here, you lose all the size you just gained, leaving many guys to wonder, "What's the point of working to build size if I'm only going to lose it in later phases?" That's a good point and a valid question.

Fortunately, there is a better way - and it's known as Concurrent Periodization. The key difference between the two is that with Concurrent Periodization, you train to achieve different goals simultaneously, rather than one after the other. A key benefit of this approach is that while training to develop one capacity you're not de-training another. In other words, you won't be investing a lot of time training for bigger muscles only to see those gains disappear after a couple of weeks when you start training for strength or power.

With Concurrent Periodization you are simultaneously training to achieve four specific goals:

1) hypertrophy (size);
2) strength;
3) power; and
4) endurance.

This strategy forms the underlying foundation of the Lean Hybrid Muscle program. The biggest benefit of this approach is that it allows you to not only build a foundation of general fitness, muscle size and strength, but it also facilitates the burning of excess body fat without the loss of muscle mass.

With most other training approaches, fat loss strategies also result in the loss of precious lean muscle mass that you've worked so hard to gain. But that doesn't happen with Lean Hybrid Muscle/Concurrent Periodization because you are linking multiple qualities (size, strength and endurance) but training them in the context of achieving an over-arching goal-simultaneously getting bigger, stronger and leaner.

Achieving these seemingly divergent goals simultaneously is possible because this training approach facilitates the development of a hybrid muscle fiber that is not only good for strength, but for endurance as well. Normal muscle fibers (type I or type II) are either built for strength or endurance - not really both. With Concurrent Periodization, instead of training for an extended time period to achieve a particular goal, the 'phases' are incorporated into a single workout or short time frames such as a day or two.

And to achieve the goal of burning body fat without losing muscle mass, strength or power, you incorporate resistance cardio, rather than just straight cardio such as jogging or biking-activities that not only burn fat, but muscle cells as well.

I want to make it clear that I'm not entirely dismissing the benefits of Linear Periodization. In fact, for specialized athletes with particular goals in mind, it can be ideal. But for those of us who want to develop multiple skill sets while simultaneously achieving different goals, Concurrent Periodization is the way to go. And if your goal is to build bigger and stronger muscles while also shedding excess body fat, then you ought to check out Lean Hybrid Muscle RELOADED.

Get my free report entitled, The Warrior Physique - Building The Super Hybrid Muscle. Click to learn how you can rapidly build muscle and burn fat at the same time.

Mike Westerdal is the founder of Critical Bench, Inc. A free online weight training magazine.


View the original article here

Read more »
These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google
  • Furl
  • Reddit
  • Spurl
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati

Dumbbells Versus Kettlebells

Everyone knows that dumbbells are extremely versatile, suitable for people of any age or level and great for training just about any body part. But over the past few years, kettlebells have been getting a lot of attention. Though we're just now hearing a lot about them, they're nothing new-they've been around for more than a hundred years. What is a kettlebell and where does it come from? Are kettlebells better than dumbbells? Well that's what I set out to discover.

Kettlebells are a traditional Russian cast iron weight. They basically look like a cast iron cannonball with a handle. Kettlebell exercises are a combination of strength and cardio exercise that are designed to build endurance and stamina. Proponents say that the kettlebell is simply the greatest tool for all-around athletic development.

Dumbbells are well, dumbbells. They've been around for thousands of years in one form or another. The Greeks and the Romans trained with their own versions of dumbbells. Versatility is a key advantage of dumbbells. They can be used to train nearly any part of the body and because they come in such a wide range of weights, can be used by just about anyone-regardless of skill level. They're also fairly inexpensive.

On the other hand, kettlebell exercises are primarily designed to develop functional strength. Their main focus is to work our 'non-mirror' muscles, the ones that we don't necessarily "see" in the mirror but are important nonetheless. That's not to say that kettlebells can't be used to train specific areas of the body-they can. It's just that the majority of kettlebell routines designed by the pros are more focused on movements that include cardio, strength-building and flexibility.

If you're into mixed martial arts or just otherwise are looking to get into some serious cross-training, then kettlebells have the advantage over dumbbells. When doing cross-training exercises with dumbbells-which mostly focus on specific muscles-you're basically restricted to using lighter weights or you run the risk of injuring yourself. With kettlebells though, the exercises require multiple muscle groups to work together, meaning that you can use higher weights, with less risk of injury (assuming proper form).

If your goal is to strictly "tone up" your body rather than to focus on developing overall strength and flexibility, then dumbbells are probably right for you. Dumbbells would also most likely be the best choice if you are recovering from an injury, are just starting out or are elderly. There are an unlimited number of dumbbell exercise techniques for toning the body or aiding in injury recovery that don't require more than five or ten pounds.

I think that if you belong to one of these categories, then you'll probably have an easier time working with dumbbells. For most of the history of kettlebells, they have been primarily used by people looking for a pretty heavy duty workout. It's only been in the last few years that professional trainers have began to realize their value as an all around fitness apparatus, so you're going to find fewer routines to choose from.

On certain levels both dumbbells and kettlebells are about equal. They both can be used in the home-or just about anywhere else-and don't require any special equipment. They're both very versatile, are suitable for all around, full-body training and can be challenging, rewarding and fun. Each can be used to target specific areas of the body and neither of them requires much of a learning curve-just about anyone can learn to use them without too much difficulty. Lastly, neither of them requires a great deal of skill or knowledge to be able to use them and get results.

So what's the verdict? Which are better, dumbbells or kettlebells? My conclusion is that neither one is "better" than the other. Both have their distinct advantages and disadvantages and can help you to achieve your fitness goals, whatever they might be. My personal choice is a combination of both-kettlebells for focusing on developing core strength and flexibility and dumbbells to isolate particular muscles and body parts. Your choice though is going to depend on your fitness goals, your skill level and ultimately, level of commitment.

Mike Westerdal is the author of "Dumbbell Exercises and Lifting Routines" To Help You Gain More Muscle, Lose Weight, or Just Get Yourself in Better Physical Shape... WITHOUT the Hassles, and Expenses of Health Clubs. Increase Your Muscle Size And Improve Your Physical Fitness In 90 Days - Guaranteed.


View the original article here

Read more »
These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google
  • Furl
  • Reddit
  • Spurl
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati